Feed on
Posts
Comments

The Room in the Attic

The short story “The Room in the Attic” is about a teenage boy who becomes infatuated with the sister of his friend, who he only ever interacts with in her darkened bedroom in the attic. At first he is understandably curious about what she looks like and plans to reveal her with a flashlight, but decides against that as it would have been an invasion of her boundaries. As time goes on, however, he comes to conflate her with the darkness. He talks about two worlds: the world of the light and the world of the dark. Isabel is a creature of the latter, and as he becomes infatuated with her he seems to become engulfed in the dark as well. The world of the dark is mysterious, unburdened by appearances, it is in a way richer. In the dark, he can imagine Isabel to be anything or anyone, while in the light his image of her fades and becomes unclear. He comes to much prefer the dark. 

Before meeting Isabel, David says: “In a murky sense I felt that my secret reading was a way of burrowing down to that underplace, where a truer or better version of myself lay waiting for me.” It seems to me that the world David imagines to exist in the dark of Isabel’s room is another manifestation of this mindset. She and the dark she inhabits are vessels that he uses to carry him to a “truer or better version of [himself].” The dark is a place for him to explore himself, a world of his own mind.

Wolf, on the other hand, sees a book as a “dream-machine” whose purpose is escapism. I think that this view can also apply to David’s perception of Isabel and the world of the dark. After all, the thousands of Isabels that he imagines, the idea of her as a semi-formless being who exists only in the dark, are not true in a literal sense, they are just his subjective ideas. He imagines Isabel in a brightly lit airport and sees this concept as somehow antithetical to her, but this is a reality that she can inhabit just as easily as a darkened bedroom. The dark allows David to exert his imagination to levels he had never accessed before, but it is a dream. 

When Isabel is ready to reveal herself to David, he flees because he is unwilling to give up this dream. He says: “No, far better for me to have turned away, to have understood that, for me, Isabel existed only in the dark. Like a ghost at dawn—like the princess of a magic realm—she had to vanish at the first touch of light.” David views Isabel as an extension of his own imagination, and compares her to the fictional figures of his books. At the first touch of light, she “vanished.” Of course, she didn’t really vanish. She probably stood in her room and watched him run out of the house, and may have felt hurt by this rejection. From David’s subjective point of view, though, she did vanish. He does not see her as a person as much as a tool for his own intellectual exploration, like a book. In the end, he chose to preserve the figure of his imagination that he called “Isabel” rather than meet the real person.

Dangerous Laughter

I read ”Dangerous Laughter” as a story about teenage angst. The children in this story long for a way to express their emotions, and this manifests as long, intense bouts of laughter. It becomes obsessive and strangely mystical, with people competing to see who can laugh the longest and the best. They form secret clubs where they come to laugh, and consider this laughter to be “a part of the kingdom of forbidden things,” along with sex. One character, Clara, has always been extremely quiet and reserved, but she can laugh longer and more intensely than anyone else, and she becomes a sort of celebrity for it. When the fad passes and most people move on to weeping as a form of expression, Clara calls the others to her house for a sort of last hurrah, where she laughs for so many hours straight that she ends up dying. I viewed the laughter as a kind of metaphor for other, more realistic “forbidden things” that teenagers take part in which can result in travesty.

One Response to “Week 2 – “The Room in the Attic” and “Dangerous Laughter””

  1. ashantibrown says:

    I was wondering if you had the same interpretation as I did when it came to David. I do feel that Isabel could’ve felt some rejection and that it made me view David in a different light and question his motives at that point. I really like how you worded it, that he chose to preserve the figure of his imagination rather than meet the actual person.

Leave a Reply