Feed on
Posts
Comments

Week 3

I read “Husband Stich” by Carmen Maria Machado. It was a story within a story and to me it was like a romance/porn book. It tells the reader when and how the narrator meets her husband and on their sexual journey before marriage and during marriage. The narrator has a green ribbon around her neck and her husband is always trying to untie and see what is underneath. She keeps telling him until the end when she finally lets him untie the ribbon and her head falls off.

A man always wants to know everything about their woman. A woman can never keep secret from her husband, but a husband can keep secret from their wife. As I am reading the story the narrator tells me about the old wives’ tale that has been passed down through generations about marriage, sex, labor, raising a child and feeling desire for another human being.

The men in my family has to know everything about the women in my family and I do not understand that. What we do and talk about with our friends and other people is none of their business. I do not tell them what I talk about because it is none of their business and that is including the other females in my family. But my mom, grandma and sister tell everything to their male partners about everything and that is why I have to watch what I say to them because they will tell them what I say.

As a writer: 

The writing style of this story was very different from the others we have read so far. The skipping back and forth between present, past, and a hypothetical future created a disorienting and confusing impression that reflected the way the narrator was feeling. In the end, the reader is left wondering what is real and what is imagined. I was also interested in Machado’s choice to name the narrator’s ex “Bad.” From the very beginning it created the expectation that things in their relationship were going to go awry. 

As a reader: 

I am relatively sure that, near the end, the narrator had entered somebody else’s house under the delusion that it was the home from her fantasies (and that those fantasies had been real), and falsely identified the children as her own. This also calls into question whether the baby, Mara, exists at all in a literal sense. It seems obvious in retrospect that the baby may not be literal, since two women cannot conceive in the first place. I think Mara may be a representation of the trauma that Bad left the narrator with after their relationship ended; something that the narrator has to learn to live with and take care of. This also fits in with the narrator’s ex being a woman, since abuse in lesbian relationships can be underrepresented / not taken as seriously as abuse of women by men. The narrator automatically assumed that because her ex was a woman, they couldn’t make a baby, and she automatically assumed that because her ex was a woman, she couldn’t be an abuser.

“Mother” is fantastic in a simple way: two women had biological children. In today’s society, it’s seemingly impossible. Yet the fantastic doesn’t just reside in the seemingly impossible.

When I was first told what motherhood entailed – caring and loving for a child for your lifetime and everything in between – I resolved to never be one. I told myself, I will not continue the generational trauma of abuse that my maternal grandmother started. I am third in the line of this trauma and abuse – and it’ll end with me. This is why I couldn’t relate to “Mother”, a story where a woman comes to learn to love motherhood – but I could appreciate the language and theme of the story, which is a mother learning to care for her children and know what’s best for them. I never had that in a mother, so it seems foreign to me. When I first read this story, I couldn’t see what the fantastic was beyond the same-sex couple having a child. To me – there was no fantastic beyond that. When I read it a second time though, the personally fantastic – in other words, what we personally find fantastic compared to others – was the idea a mother could love.

Trigger warning: The next part of this post describes emotional abuse and toxic family. Please skip to bolded “Fin” if you are triggered by these topics.

Not to go too much into my personal life (yes JGB I have to, to make my point. Yes I know but hear me out) but my mother did actually seem to care once. My earliest memories are of her playing with us sisters, being happy then laughing. Then something happened. I went from being played with to my entire room being emptied out over an autistic meltdown. Then it was constant arguing, screams that sent me into tears, and purposefully (by her) on-set tantrums and spying. Not long after, the parentification of watching my ten-year-old sister and six-month-old brother. Then the outright emotional abuse.

I only just ended it. I will not be continuing it.

Fin triggering content.

All this to say that the fantastic in this story is a mother who cares to me – in this world, there are plenty of them, but not enough. Personal fantastic is amazing – in a way, it’s how we bond with the story, turn it into our escapism. I did it with several books – Warriors, Harry Potter, The King’s Men (Book 3 of the “All For the Game Trilogy) and “Mother” proves to be joining that list. It’s intoxicating to me – how much this woman despises, then comes to love her children. It’s the story I wish I had instead of my horrid one. It’s personally very fantastic to me – I can’t imagine this, my brain won’t allow me.

The personal fantastic presents itself in everyday life – we daydream, read, create. “Mother” strikes my personal fantastic in such a way I went back and read it five times in two hours of my own accord (seven total, twice for this assignment) because it’s escapism. It’s the mother I wanted but never got. And isn’t that fantastic, that something as simple as a story of a woman taking in her biological child and loving her, can be escapism for a generation that may not have its mothers?

This weeks stories consisted of many things that will make readers squirm in their seats uncomfortably, but also find voice and relatability in the text as well. Out of all the stories that we read “The Husband Stitch” was my favorite. The amount of detail that the author gave about the woman’s life throughout all of these stages she went through was amazing to me.

She began with this want and need for the man that she eventually would marry and give her entire life to (literally). I feel as though many women could relate to feeling like they have to give into their men and be this sexual figure. She really enjoyed pleasuring him which felt as though it benefited her and him, but it also could have become unhealthy very quickly.

The things that she was going through with her husband did not seem to ultimately have an affect on her relationship with her son. There was an instance where her son asked about her ribbon and she had to distract him from questioning further, something she had to keep doing with her husband until she gave in and eventually died from it.

This story quickly became one of my favorites because of the voice and the way it was explained. There was so much detail which made it very enjoyable to me.

“The Husband Stitch” by Carmen Maria Machado was absolutely compelling and did not allow me to stop reading it. The use of the short stories and the instructions to the reader were masterfully done in a way in which the flow of the story is uninterrupted and gives the reader an additional context to the protagonist’s feelings.

While I read “The Husbands Stitch,” the use of foreshadowing to the ending stood out. From the beginning of the story until the end, the author emphasized how sexually active women never have good endings. Additionally, the beginning of the story also foreshadowed how much more the woman cared for her male partner. As she states, “In the beginning, I know I want him before he does (3).” From the very first sentence we are introduced to the idea that the woman is more invested than the male, which ties to how their relationship ended, with the protagonist, in spite of her knowledge that the ribbon will presumably harm or kill her, allowing for her husband to take it off, something which was masterfully placed since the very beginning for the reader to pass through it without much thought. Additionally, the foreshadowing is beautifully followed by the myth and lore.

The myth and lore provided by the author is in third person, which is different from the protagonist first person. This gave me the sense that the author herself was giving me these stories, which would later be tied to the first person story. Additionally, these myths and lore also give the readers the sense of foreshadowing. The myths and lore which intertwines the original story makes me hyperaware that there is another story, and that it must be of importance to the story. Hence, this makes me think that these additional stories are foreshadowing the original stories ending. Another place in which I as a reader get taken out of the story would be during the times when instructions are given. Although, they take me out of the current story they somehow immerse me more into the narrative. The instructions which are provided allow me to become more aware of the feeling which are being portrayed by the protagonist and also allows for me to empathize with the protagonist.

Lastly, the some of the themes that I thought were present in “The Husbands Stitch” were love, fear, rejection, and conformity. For instance, till the last moments of the protagonist she proclaimed her love to her husband; even though, he was the ultimate reason for her demise (31). Additionally, the actions exhibited by her sons’ eventual change from a young child that viewed the ribbon as a part of his mother to something that he could take could show the conformity of how people change due to outside forces and beliefs (21).

I found “The Husband Stitch” and “Inventory,” both by Carmen Maria Machadoz, to be compelling in their own ways. I started “The Husband Stitch” with an air of caution, having heard the title before, only used in different contexts. I was surprised to find its protagonist to be such a bold woman for the time she seems to be set in. “Inventory” started off strong as well, with a similarly bold protagonist of its own.

Both stories use great foreshadowing to hint at their endings. The narrator of “The Husband Stitch” mentions stories in which sexually liberated women meet unpleasant ends. From the start, it is clear that she is the same type of woman as those in her tales. She relays her own story of meeting and marrying her husband, and of raising the child she has with him. In between her descriptions of her sex life with her husband, she drops in stories of women who have done similar things and been punished for them. It gave me a sense of building anxiety, feeling that it was hinting at what was to come. When she finally meets her own end, it is both satisfying to reach what has been foreshadowed and upsetting to see that her story had to end that way. 

The narrator of “Inventory” writes about the lists she makes when she’s anxious, and the reader comes to understand that the story itself is one of those lists. It was interesting to see how her list of sexual partners slowly morphs into the tale of how a rampant plague has affected her life. Just as the plague took over the world, it takes over her list, which by all means should have had nothing to do with a deadly illness. Admittedly, I didn’t make the connection between her listing of partners and the other lists she creates until the end of the story. When I noticed it, however, it felt like everything fell into place. I felt that it ended the story by wrapping it up in a neat, slightly horrifying, sad, little bow.

Another interesting, shared concept between “The Husband Stitch” and “Inventory” is that of sexually active, unashamed women having sad endings to their lives. It is common to see women like these protagonists suffering for their sexual behavior in media. Machadoz, however, does not vilify these women but uplifts them as the real, living, breathing, human beings they are meant to be. There is such a cliche among sexy women in movies, books, and the like as being portrayed as evil. Over and over, the protagonists are pretty, and the villains are sexy. Examples can be seen in mainstream titles such as the new Godzilla movie, Godzilla vs. Kong, or, arguably, No Time to Die. Machodoz challenges this with her much more realistic characters, showing the reader that women, even sexually liberated ones, are people, too.

Magic Realism

This is my first exposure to Carmen Maria Machado’s work, and I am glad I didn’t have to endure another day without being familiar with it. Not that my preference is relevant, but I find her work quite enjoyable.

fernand-leger-playing-card-and-pipe-ferleg1809Captivating aspects of Machado’s work in both “The Husband Stitch” and “Inventory” are the tone and format of the writing. In “The Husband Stitch” the first lines being a directive to readers is a foreshadowing of the unique body of work that lies ahead. Throughout the story the directives continue, shifting in intensity. Layered between these directives are alternating first-person narratives and third-person stories of myth and lore. The first-person narratives that incorporate coming of age scenes (losing virginity, first boyfriend, marriage, childbirth) are intentionally coupled with mythic stories that usually involve some sort of tragedy to a woman. In the end of the story, the ultimate tragedy comes to a head as the narrator is taken out of narration itself and presumably dies. The voice of the narrator at the end is distinct from the first person accounts and entanglements of fantasy in the majority of the story prior. 

d463ec720102bd06286684eafb309af9

The style in which Machado writes is darkly comedic and quite palatable despite the serious undertones and real, painful experiences that are highlighted. Magical realism provides sugary coatings for hard to swallow pills.

This palatable, dark humor is present in “Inventory” as well. What starts out as an entertaining recollection of sexual encounters morphs into a collection of distractions from the impending doom of the surrounding world. The experiences in “Inventory” are experiences everyone can relate to, in the sense that humans are frequently searching for an ‘out’, a distraction. Sex, historically for many, is a prime and primal way to escape reality. A moment of connection in a progressively disconnected world, and in the case of “Inventory” a progressively dying humanity. This story particularly seems all too relevant, an epidemic read during a pandemic. What has been your ‘out’? What have you been keeping inventory of through the past years of change, more years of growing up, and constant chaos that is the world we know?

 

“The Husband Stitch”

Green Ribbon

The Husband Stitch is an interesting take on one of my favorite short horror stories “The Green Ribbon” A story of a girl with a green ribbon around her neck who never allows her husband to remove it till old age, only for her head to fall off. This variation of the story played very much into the entitlement the husband of the nameless protagonist had over her body. From the very beginning, she made the rule that he could not touch her ribbon repeatedly throughout the story he violates this boundary of hers. He claims she shouldn’t have secrets but the protagonist tells him it is not a secret it is just hers and since she has given her whole life to him he cannot respect the one thing she asks of him.

Another example of her husband’s entitlement is asking the doctor about “A husband stitch” while ignoring his in pain wife. A husband stitch is “an extra stitch given during the repair process after a vaginal birth, supposedly to tighten the vagina for the increased pleasure of a male sexual partner” as explained by a Huffington Post article on the matter. This is a very real thing that in itself is a disgusting violation of a woman’s body to indulge her husband’s pleasure but can also have potential negative impacts on a woman’s health. The nurse tells her that she is stitched up “nice and tight” but the protagonist is in so much pain she cannot physically sleep with her husband till around their son’s first birthday.

This attitude of her husband even comes to rub off on their son. Before he realized his father’s obsession with his mother’s ribbon he could touch it and his mother let him as “it never makes me afraid” (18). The boy simply accepts it as part of his mother. Then after his fight over the ribbon, he tries to take it off repeatedly when his mother says no and the special bond the two had before is gone. But the protagonist still loves her son arguably more than her husband, pained when she accidentally scares him and the relief of his forgetting of the situation. He also seems to understand when his mother explains her ribbon to him when he is older. It is hers and hers alone and that seems to not escape her son like it has his father.

Even in the end, when she lets her husband untie her ribbon it is not because she feels ready, but rather her “Resolve runs out” (32). And her husband is instantly ready to take it off. Even in her final moments, knowing what is going to happen she tells her husband how much she loves him. Her husband now is left with the consequences of his entitlement and selfishness, his wife’s decapitated body now in their bed, what will he do? What will he tell their son how his own actions caused the death of his mother? Was it worth it?

The “Room in the Attic” is a story about a teenager named David who is excelling in his high school classes, when during the schoolyear; he befriends a young boy named John “Wolf” & gets to know Wolf’s sister. Wolf’s sister, Isabel is a mysterious girl with an illness that is not explained. Throughout the story, David plays guessing games and begins to wonder more about her. David is attracted to a girl he knows little about nor what she looks like. He longs to see her face and often fantasies about what she could look like.

As I was reading this story, I had some observations about the interactions between David and Isabel. As mentioned in the story that Isabel had a “breakdown” that led to her being homeschooled; isolated from the outside world in her dark room. Though never explained how the breakdown took place or what led to it, I believe she has agoraphobia–an anxiety disorder that causes a fear of public, crowded spaces. Agoraphobia can come on suddenly and I believe this is what she developed. Along with this, she rarely leaves her room and goes downstairs.

Another observation I had consists of the fact that I believe David would not have fantasies and feelings for Isabel if she was not a walking mystery. For example, he fantasies about her face and body at the beach. It is stated towards the end of the story that he decides to not see what she looks like– covering his eyes. He had a chance to see her face yet decided against it. I believe this was due to not wanting to ruin the image he had of her and smash the mystery she is. After this, he begins to question reality and her existence. Later, he begins to move on in life and forgets details of her.

Week 2

This weeks reading were interesting to say the least. The most interesting and chaotic one to me is “Dangerous Laughter”. During the boredom of the summer kids are forced to make up their own fun and this leads to them doing a lot of weird stuff. The idea of having laughing competitions is normal and innocent fun but I thought it was strange for kids to come up with “laugh parlors” for some people to feed into their laughing obsessions. Like how do you even come up with that? The character ,Clara, was the main part of the story I thought about even after reading it. Clara started of as a shy girl who didn’t talk much and barely even moved and during the course of the story she becomes the queen of laughter but slowly she gets addicted to these parties and parlors. This leads me to believe that this laughter let her get out all of the the emotions she had never said or expressed and while this is a good thing its never good to do anything excessively. With great pleasure there can also be great pain. When she brought all of the kids to her attic and started laughing the narrator said “no one would forgive her for this” this line struck me because he probably thought that she had brought them there to endure and feel all of the emotions that she was letting out by laughing and this is kind of like “trauma dumping” but he stayed until he couldn’t take it anymore.

WITH “Room in the Attic,” I was drawn to how David is becoming more drawn to the darkness as he is drawn to Isabel. It to me represented mystery — and how both Isabel is, and David becomes one.

In “Room in the Attic,” David can’t see Isabel due to her room being completely dark. It puts their relationship — which I interpret as a friendship, not a romance for the record — in total darkness, something David can’t recall exactly when he’s in the light for long periods of time. He slowly becomes obsessed with the dark and Isabel both, and only wakes up from the darkness when Isabel is gone. And somehow, there’s a beauty in that — the representation of Isabel, cloaked in mystery, as David becomes more mysterious as the story goes on. He lies to his parents, calls sick into work, and does so much more to conceal his attachment to Isabel and his need to learn more about her. This want of his to know more about Isabel, to see her even at one point.

This darkness represents the mysteries of Isabel yet serves as a good thing for David – he never once judges her for how she looks, and rather keeps to his imagination. He only sees her as her personality, which is fun-loving. The mystery never does indeed solve itself – many might think Isabel is a monster, yet she actually fits the bill more of a ghost. This adds to the mystery – if Isabel is a ghost, what happened to her to cause her demise? David doesn’t seem to care what she is – she is a friend of his, playing games with her and talking. Yet it also serves as a bad thing – he loses sleep over her, he lies to his parents, skips his job, even starts to dislike the light because of his obsession with Isabel. He himself starts to become a mystery – leading to the culminating event.

David only gets one opportunity to see Isabel – and he ruins it. Why? one might ask. A reason is never given – but one can imagine he wants to keep the mystery of Isabel, keep the mystery of himself. Mysteries are fun – well, most are. The secrecy is thrilling, finding out the answer ends it, but gives satisfaction. David seems to not want that satisfaction though – he’d rather stay in darkness. We never know the answer, and can only imagine it.

The mystery of Isabel, and the one David becomes, are thrilling – especially considering three days later, Isabel is gone. She’s moved to her aunt’s in Maine, her mother claims, to attend public high school. That mystery of why only adds to Isabel, yet David becomes less of a mystery without her occupying his mind – he returns to normal, to the light. Yet he always has a bit of that mystery – in his thoughts and memories.

Mystery is a dark thing inherently. Whether it be murder or a girl who’s only in darkness, theft or a boy with secrets to hide – the darkness of mysteries is thrilling. And by taking this darkness and putting it literally, Steven Millhauser writes a thrilling tale – of a mystery pair.

“The Room in the Attic” by Steven Millhauser has the theme of turning a blind eye to something. The main character and narrator David meets a girl who lives in a pitch-black room in her attic. As David grows closer with this girl, Isabel, he wonders constantly about her appearance. He even starts dreaming about what she might look like. He starts spending every hour he can afford with her in her room. When he isn’t with her, he is collecting items and descriptions to bring to her. His sleeping schedule even changes to reflect hers. David’s behavior seems obsessive, but he doesn’t seem to think so. The choice to tell this story in first person makes it feel as if his behavior is nothing out of the ordinary, because David acts like it is.

When David finally has the chance to see Isabel in the light after months of visiting her, he prevents it last-minute. He wants to stay in the bubble he’s created, where everything is familiar and safe. Instead of learning what could be a beautiful or an ugly truth, David backs out entirely. It could be metaphorical for someone wanting to “stay in the dark” about something they enjoy, because the possible downsides could ruin its status of perfection.

Another metaphor I thought could be present through my first readthrough of this story was that of addiction. Isabel’s brother Wolf has an infatuation with books. He talks about them differently than others do, like they are much better than everyone else thinks. David becomes infatuated with Isabel and her dark room. She decides she wants to very suddenly come into the light, instead of bit by bit. This feels similar to someone stopping their bad habit all at once instead of quitting it slowly. David’s refusal to look at Isabel once she’s revealed herself could be him realizing he isn’t ready to give up his addiction, after all, and refusing to quit it.

“Dangerous Laughter” by the same author also seemed to have the theme of addiction. The narrator and his fellow teenagers in his town start the summer by looking for something new and interesting to get involved in to pass the time. They all turn to laughing as a hobby, and eventually create clubs revolving around it. It becomes competitive, with everyone yearning to laugh the hardest and longest. They tickle one another to get the most intense laughs. Clara Schuler comes along, and she outdoes all of them. Laughing transforms her into someone new, someone people pay attention to. As the laughing trend turns to crying, Clara sticks with her original talent. This could be compared to others moving on from their obsessions or possible addictions while Clara cannot quit. Eventually, much like a dangerous addiction will do, Clara’s knack for laughing kills her.

Week Two

I read “The Room in The Attic” and “Dangerous Laughter” by Steven Millhauser. In both of these stories, being restless and wanting more was a common theme. In “The Room in The Attic” a boy in high school is living a secret life. In school he acts normal and hangs out with his friends but when he is at the library or home, he is secretly reading books. One day he meets a new boy at the school who reads too but out in public. The new boy is Wolf and takes the boy. Dave to his house. There he meets Wolf’s sister Isabelle who sleeps in the attic. Every time Dave hangs out with Isabelle, he craves more into the unknown. Her room is completely dark, and Dave can see Isabelle, but he does not care.

He starts thinking that he is living in two parallel worlds. One with Isabelle and one without Isabelle. I love to read and the books that I read take me to different places then the one I am at. Books take me to another so I can escape from reality.  I want to know more on what is happening next but at the same time I don’t want to know. When I read, I imagine on what the characters look like in real life, but I know that they will look different than what I have imagine.

Dave wants to know what Isabelle looks like at first but then he changed his made but that did not stop him from imaging on what she looked like and what she was wearing. At the end when she was going to show herself to him, he ran away and did not come back until he realize that Wolf did not come to school for a while. He did not want to know the truth of want she looked like because he did not want his image of her destroyed.

When we are stuck in our world, we do not want to see things differently than what we have imagined. We are in a bubble that fits arounds us and expands when we want to know more but when somethings happen, we do not want to believe then the bubble closes around us.  We want to know more about a bout the world but when we see dark and bad things happening, we run away and try our best to forget the bad memorious and focus on happy things.

 

Dream Girl

At some point, a fair assumption can be made that we –collectively– have all idealized a person to the extent that the way we have crafted them in our heads does not correlate with the person they are in dark roomreal life. We create an image of this person in our minds, oftentimes with unreachable standards. The disappointment that can be felt when we acknowledge that these people are simply just people, and not the romanticized version, is justifiably heartbreaking. So, when our narrator decides to not see Isabel for who she is and instead leaves with the fantasized version still intact, it almost seems warranted. What if her physical appearance does not live up to his standards? What if this completely changes how he perceives her as an individual? He has an unmatched connection to a girl he has never seen before and knowing that seeing her would significantly humanize her, he decides to opt-out.

Perhaps he is aware of the fact that Isabel is, in some ways, nothing more than a fantasy. He thinks about her constantly, always eagerly awaiting the next time he can talk to her. While Wolf begins as the centerpiece of our narrator’s obsession, it’s obvious that Isabel soon becomes his secret pipe drearunninglolm. His fixation on her causes her to become something not obtainable, and the moment that she is, he doesn’t want that non-obtainability to cease. The chase ends. The magic is lost.

And when she ultimately leaves and he loses his one chance at uncovering what she really looks like, his fantasy of her can continue She is still unknown to him, still unreachable. She is still a dream that he can disappear to.

 

 

 

 

 

Imagination

In The Room in the Attic, David, the protagonist, is infatuated with his friend’s little sister. David befriends a guy named Wolf, who spends most of his time reading or contemplating the nature of people. Over time David and Wolf become close friends. Wolf invites David over to meet Isabel, Wolf’s sister who lives in the dark. On David’s first visit to Wolf‘s, Wolf introduces David to Isabel. Later, David starts to visit Isabel regularly. During their visits, Isabel plays games where David has to trust her. David begins to imagine what Isabel might look like. He thinks random women could be Isabel. Why does David spend so much time with a girl he can‘t see, just hear? David covers his eyes so he won’t see Isabel when the chance arises to finally see how she looks; he turns and leaves to never return. 

One can find examples of the fantastic in fiction in Millhauser’s The Room in the Attic, in which he explores the idea of imagination and wonder, and how they can affect one’s life. Some may view this story as a metaphor for addiction. David depended on Isabel. It is his habit to visit her house, talk to her, and think about her constantly. David’s addiction would have ended if he had looked at her when she opened the curtains. It is impossible to separate addiction from imagination. David spent a lot of time imagining how Isabel could have looked: everything from the color of her hair to how she would have worn her dress. Our imagination provides us with the opportunity to think what if? People tend to flee from reality when confronted with it.  Without a sense of wonder, there is nothing left for the imagination, which can lead to disappointment or despair. So was David scared to see Isabel because he would be disappointed? 

In Dangerous Laughter, the story focuses on these laughing clubs. Kids came together to laugh at their amusement. A cult-like feeling is created by the constant laughter in the story. Following this introduction, we learn of Clara. Clara is a bit of an oddity among her classmates; she is described as a stiff character who seems to act like those around her as well as maintaining a stiff outer appearance. Likewise, her socks and shirts are neatly tucked in. The other children are shown to find it remarkable that Clara can laugh for long periods of time and loudly. This makes her popular with them. She dies after spending too much time laughing at the end of the story. When adolescents are a part of group, they tend to mimic those around them; inevitably, if they find something which impresses those around them, they risk losing a part of themselves in it.

Dream Machine

“The Room In The Attic” is told by the main character David, who becomes obsessed with his friend’s sister. His friend, Wolf, is already an interesting character that does not care for the things school has to offer. After his initial encounter with David, Wolf introduces him to Isabel. David never sees her due to the darkness of her room. He plays with her in the dark, games that test his imagination and challenge him to pay attention to the little things that happen in everyday life. She becomes an invisible presence in his life, intruding on his thoughts as well as his daily schedule, and he falls in love with the idea with her. When Isabel decides that she wants to bring herself into the light, David shields his eyes to avoid seeing her, and he leaves. This results in him never visiting or seeing her again, as she leaves to visit her aunt and attend school elsewhere.

 

Millhauser’s “The Room In The Attic” demonstrates another example of an imagination or an idea of someone, and the impact that they have on others. That being said, it is possible that Isabel herself is a figment of David’s imagination. Before he meets Isabel, Wolf talks about how a book is a “dream-machine” and its purpose is to “take you out of the world” (39). Isabel tends to do this exact thing to David, especially when he is no longer in the same room as her. It is very similar to the feeling you get when reading a book that has grabbed your interest, and you want nothing more than to continue reading it, but you are not allowed to read it all day. However, in this case, David does not want to see her face, because it takes him back into reality. He likes his ideal version of her, and doesn’t want to ruin that image. It is also possible that he is scared that if he tries to see her, he will find nothing at all, and she never really existed. Isabel is his dream-machine; when she leaves, his life goes back to a sense of normalcy and boring interactions, wondering if he anything he had experienced ever really happened.

Week 2

There were two stories to read for class, “The Room in the Attic” and “Dangerous Laughter.”

The Room in the Attic
In “The Room in the Attic,” it starts the story by introducing Wolf, who isn’t even the main protagonist. However, we learn that Wolf befriends a boy named David, and the story follows him and his interactions between himself and Wolf’s sister, isabel. The audience learns that Isabel must live in darkness, as she lives in the attic in complete darkness. David starts to go to the attic to interact with Isabel, which causes him to create these illusions of what isabel might look like. David becomes almost obsessed with what Isabel might look like, even going as far as turning a flashlight on to look at her. However, I think the big reason why David didn’t want to see Isabel when he had the chance was because he didn’t want to destroy the curiosity that she held. It’s the same idea as to where ‘a magician doesn’t reveal his secrets’ the magic trick would lose the feeling of being magical.

Dangerous Laughter
In “Dangerous Laughter,” the story follows the idea of these laughing clubs. Children would congregate into these laughing parlors and laugh away. The story gives an oddly eerie vibe about the constant laughing like it was slowly creating a cult. Then the audience is introduced to a girl named Clara. She’s almost like an odd egg to the school. Clara is described as a very stiff character, who seems to make all of her actions exact, as well as maintaining a stiff outer presence. Her socks are straight, not a hair out of place, and her shirts tucked in. Clara is shown to have an amazing ability to these other children that she is able to laugh loudly, and for long moments of time. Clara gains popularity by her weird ability to laugh. In the end of the story, she ends up dying from spending too much time laughing. The things children due to be a part of the group.

This week we were given another round on stories to analyze and dissect. “Cat N Mouse”, “The Disappearance of Elaine Coleman”, “The Room In The Attic”, and “Dangerous Laughter”. The story that stood out the most to me was “The Room In The Attic”. This story had me hanging onto every word and I found it very enjoyable.

The story starts off describing a character named Wolf. We are already aware that the story is  not about him, but the author chooses to start off describing him because of his importance in the story. The story is actually about a boy named David, and we start out by describing their dynamic as friends. Something that I noticed in the story was that Wolf and David did not really hang out with one another when David’s other friends were present. Their friendship was very odd to me because it seemed so different, they were an unusual but usual pairing in my opinion because they had so many things in common, but Wolf was not the type of person that David usually surrounded himself with. It makes me wonder if David’s “regular” friends (Ray and Dennis) knew that he liked to read and how he was often caught in deep thought as the story progresses.

The story continues with David meeting Wolf’s sister, Isabel. This part of the story was very intriguing to me and is the main reason I chose to write this blog post about it. The dynamic between Isabel and David was confusing at first to me. He was allowed to meet her, but it was in complete darkness. It gave me the impression that Isabel was very fragile, there was something that must be wrong with her. My other impression was that she must be some sort of creature that is not of this world, or, like our other stories, she turned into some animal or beast. I was afraid that his first couple of times meeting her would result in Wolf or Isabel herself feeling disrespected by something he did and this story taking a dark turn. The story does give off a certain vibe that there is much that we do not know about this family, the father was rarely brought up and the mother brought up many questions in my mind. There was a lot of suspense whenever David would go to meet Isabel and I think that’s something the author wanted. You never knew what was going to happen next and that is exactly what kept me reading and waiting for the moment that David actually got to see who Isabel was or what she wasn’t. I was nervous to see wha would happen to David when he did see Isabel and what that would mean for him.

The end of the story was something that I was not expecting. David was given the choice to see Isabel, but he did not take it. He allowed it to continue being a mystery which I understand, but why? It was something that he had questioned for so long, something he daydreamed about. He seemed to be almost obsessed with the idea of Isabel, but when he was finally able to see her especially in a moment that seemed very important to her, he left her. At the end of the story David continues his life and he continues living as if this was not something that was major in his life, almost forgetting about the details that took place as a whole. It made me think about David’s character and what the author wanted to portray here. Did he want the reader to see David as selfish or was it really just the need for mystery?

The Room in the Attic

The short story “The Room in the Attic” is about a teenage boy who becomes infatuated with the sister of his friend, who he only ever interacts with in her darkened bedroom in the attic. At first he is understandably curious about what she looks like and plans to reveal her with a flashlight, but decides against that as it would have been an invasion of her boundaries. As time goes on, however, he comes to conflate her with the darkness. He talks about two worlds: the world of the light and the world of the dark. Isabel is a creature of the latter, and as he becomes infatuated with her he seems to become engulfed in the dark as well. The world of the dark is mysterious, unburdened by appearances, it is in a way richer. In the dark, he can imagine Isabel to be anything or anyone, while in the light his image of her fades and becomes unclear. He comes to much prefer the dark. 

Before meeting Isabel, David says: “In a murky sense I felt that my secret reading was a way of burrowing down to that underplace, where a truer or better version of myself lay waiting for me.” It seems to me that the world David imagines to exist in the dark of Isabel’s room is another manifestation of this mindset. She and the dark she inhabits are vessels that he uses to carry him to a “truer or better version of [himself].” The dark is a place for him to explore himself, a world of his own mind.

Wolf, on the other hand, sees a book as a “dream-machine” whose purpose is escapism. I think that this view can also apply to David’s perception of Isabel and the world of the dark. After all, the thousands of Isabels that he imagines, the idea of her as a semi-formless being who exists only in the dark, are not true in a literal sense, they are just his subjective ideas. He imagines Isabel in a brightly lit airport and sees this concept as somehow antithetical to her, but this is a reality that she can inhabit just as easily as a darkened bedroom. The dark allows David to exert his imagination to levels he had never accessed before, but it is a dream. 

When Isabel is ready to reveal herself to David, he flees because he is unwilling to give up this dream. He says: “No, far better for me to have turned away, to have understood that, for me, Isabel existed only in the dark. Like a ghost at dawn—like the princess of a magic realm—she had to vanish at the first touch of light.” David views Isabel as an extension of his own imagination, and compares her to the fictional figures of his books. At the first touch of light, she “vanished.” Of course, she didn’t really vanish. She probably stood in her room and watched him run out of the house, and may have felt hurt by this rejection. From David’s subjective point of view, though, she did vanish. He does not see her as a person as much as a tool for his own intellectual exploration, like a book. In the end, he chose to preserve the figure of his imagination that he called “Isabel” rather than meet the real person.

Dangerous Laughter

I read ”Dangerous Laughter” as a story about teenage angst. The children in this story long for a way to express their emotions, and this manifests as long, intense bouts of laughter. It becomes obsessive and strangely mystical, with people competing to see who can laugh the longest and the best. They form secret clubs where they come to laugh, and consider this laughter to be “a part of the kingdom of forbidden things,” along with sex. One character, Clara, has always been extremely quiet and reserved, but she can laugh longer and more intensely than anyone else, and she becomes a sort of celebrity for it. When the fad passes and most people move on to weeping as a form of expression, Clara calls the others to her house for a sort of last hurrah, where she laughs for so many hours straight that she ends up dying. I viewed the laughter as a kind of metaphor for other, more realistic “forbidden things” that teenagers take part in which can result in travesty.

Week 2 –

The short story of “The Room in the Attic” by Steven Millhauser was extremely interesting and engaging. The story revolves around a young kid, named David, that seems to become obsessed with his friends sister, who he meets but does not see. As he gets to know more about Isabel he starts to imagine what she would be like and his, “brain was so filled with false Isabel’s that I pressed my hands against the sides of my head, as if to crush them to death (9).” Most of the times he though of Isabel he would simply imagine and have fantasies of what she would look like, as he always meet her in the dark. He also would, ” [try] to imagine her in the world of light (9),” which could indicate that at this point he did not see Isabel as a person, but a figment of his imagination and maybe even desires. To David, Isabel could be a beautiful young girl, or as he also describe she could end u being deformed and hiding. Also, this separates Isabel from much of David’s everyday ‘world’, and puts a barrier between Isabel and David. As, David seems to put Isabel in a specific area in which he does not have any desire to remove her from. Then, when David has the opportunity to see Isabel for the first time he runs away, which seems to imply that he was afraid that his dream, fantasies, or desires would end. It could also imply that Isabel was only interesting to David in the midst of the mystery, and that as soon as he uncovered the mystery he would no longer be interested which could of been something which he feared. Lastly, when David went back to see Isabel after running away she had already left. This to me seems to tie to the idea that as long as Isabel stayed in the dark David’s ideals of her would remain pure and untouched in his mind.

Then, there was the short story of “Dangerous Laughter”. I also this was interesting and compelling in the way it allowed for the readers to feel a sense of alienation from the craze of the laughing parties like the narrator themselves were experiencing. The way the story is told really allows for the reader to feel as if they are looking outside in. Something that caught my attention as I read was how Clara was described as somewhat of an outcast, and that as she was in the laughing parties she seemed, “as if she were being punished in some humiliating way (10).” This made me think of how people go out of their comfort zone in order to fit in and do stupid and out of character things in order to be able to be a part of a group. Clara who seemed like the type of character to not be interested in these types of activities seemed to indulge in them in order to make herself a part of the crowd. When Clara died I thought of it being a warning of how this could have happened to the narrator if she had tried hard to fit in as Clara had done.

David Dreaming?

Hallway

“No, far better to have turned away, to have understood that, for me, Isabel existed only in the dark.” (74).

Millhauser does an interesting concept in “The Room in the Attic” on not confirming or denying if Isabel is real. Even at the very end of the story, David still isn’t 100% on if Isabel was real or his mind had made it all up with Wolf’s slight manipulations. After meeting the supposed Isabel, David seems to be pulled into an almost fantasy realm and comes over to just sit in the dark and talk to Isabel and it begins impacting his life. He comes over to Wolf’s house not to spend time with his friend but rather sit in the dark talking to a girl who may not even be real. Wolf on his end seems oddly chill with his friend coming in and sitting in the attic.

David seems so wrapped up in the allure of Isabel to the point that when she goes to show herself to him that he turns away not wanting the illusion of her he’d built in his reality that the potential of it to be broken was something he didn’t want. This really brings into the question of if Isabel is real or not. David might have been an overactive mind and created Isabel with prompting from his friend. There could be the argument on if Wolf was really real but based the fact rumors about him flunking out of his previous school that Wolf might actually be real.

Wolf brings up that the difference between animals and humans is that humans were able to dream while awake (42). Millhauser seems to be dropping hints that Isabel could possibly be all part of an experiment done by Wolf on his friend David to see if David was a dreamer, and if Isabel truly isn’t real, David would seem to be.

 

 

Forbidden Fiction

In the next two stories from Millhauser that we were required to read for today, both “The Room in the Attic” and “Dangerous Laughter” dealt with the forbidden and its attraction. The first story, “The Room in the Attic,” relied heavily on the differences of light and total darkness as a technique for pulling the reader into a world that was unknown and seemingly off-limits. David is pulled into this world by a new student at his school, Wolf, who brings him to his house and to his sister’s room. Isabel had a mental break down the year before and her “convalescence” requires her to stay mainly in darkness. The situation itself feels forbidden; David is pulled into Isabel’s room and they are left there alone and uninterrupted in the dark. This feeling is deepened by Isabel’s game of giving David something to feel and making him guess what it is, sometimes even using her own body. At first, David wants to see in her the light, and even brings a flashlight to her room. However, he then changes his mind, narrating, “It seemed to me that to shine the light on Isabel, to expose her to my greedy gaze, would be like tearing off her clothes.” (pg. 54) I think what the story is trying to impress upon the reader is how we experience attraction to mystery and taboo. Towards the end of the story when Isabel is about to open the curtains for the first time, David suddenly runs away without looking at her. I think that this was his acknowledgement that without the mystery surrounding Isabel, she would become uninteresting to him, and he was scared of that.

In “Dangerous Laughter,” the main character is also dealing with themes of the forbidden. The spasms of laughter that everyone strives to control in the laugh clubs and parlors are outside of the realm of the narrator, who has something blocking them from laughing like the others. The way the story is written from the narrator’s perspective and the delineation into rumors gives it a strong feeling of being an outsider in a world you can’t access; both the narrator and the reader are forbidden from laughing in the way that releases the tension inside. Clara Schuler then gives the main character a way into that world– while they’ve never really talked, they exist around each other, and it gives her a connection to the world that’s forbidden from her. In a way, the narrator seems to be living in that forbidden world through Clara, and when she dies in the laughing accident, it almost feels like the narrator is saved from that fate. She was able to feel connected to the laughing movement through Clara, and when the movement dies out, so does Clara, removing the narrator from that world and allowing her to move on.

Use Your Imagination

3d rendering of darken empty attic with aged stuff and light rays through holes

Steven Millhauser’s “The Room in The Attic” immediately led me down a train of thought of how literature itself is a representation of the fantastic, and acts as a fantastical object in day-to-day life.

The introduction of Wolf, and his opinion that “books weren’t made of themes, which you could write essays about, but of images that inserted themselves into your brain and replaced what you were seeing with your eyes” is a sentiment that comprises the whole of the story (3). David’s entire experience with Isabel is absent of visual representation, but rather he uses his other senses to compile imagery of Isabel. The imagery goes through different forms, “blue-eyed Isabels and smiling Isabels, Isabels in red shorts, Isabels in faded jeans…” pleasant imagery of the playful adolescent following disturbing imagery as well (11). The variety of forms Isabel takes up in David’s imagination is similar to how the imagery of a story or novel can manifest in different ways, at different times, in both the same individual’s mind, as well as between separate individuals. 

The fantastic part of David’s experience “is [in] the dark room, the realm, the mystery of Isabel-land” where “the other world dissolved in a solution of black” (18). The darkness of the attic, while shutting out the outside world, is itself a world for David. Similarly when indulging in literature oftentimes the curtains of the outside world can be drawn shut, while the curtains of an imaginary, fantastical realm can be drawn open. David highlights that “the real division was between the visible world and that other world, where Isabel waited for [him] like a dark dream,” giving way to the notion that Isabel herself is not the other world herself, but a manifestation of a part of that world, a vessel for which the world comes to exist (15). Parallel are characters in literature, though they are the vessel in which the world is introduced, literature allows the entrenchment into the ‘other world’ outside of its own narrative and plot.

Most interesting to me, and important to this train of literary thought, is that David runs away from Isabel when she is ready to be revealed to the light. This, for me, indicates the importance of agency when interacting with art of any kind. Art, and therefore literature, is meant to evoke a response, a feeling, and intellectual introspection. David’s running away made me think of how I approach perusing an art museum, or observe a piece of art. I look at the physical aspects of the painting, take note of my emotional reaction, and try to piece together what it all may mean. If I am particularly curious about the artist or piece, I may look up the intended meaning (if the artist has revealed such). However, there is always a shift in my perception of the painting once I read an analysis or historical interpretation of the art. David fleeing from Isabel’s true form is synonymous with me leaving the piece of art unexamined, letting it remain in my brain and memory influenced only by imagination, and the medium the artist used. David’s imagination of Isabel is a sacred piece of art, and an experience he wishes to keep untainted. However, I also divulge that literature and art can be equally fantastic with varying perspectives, and may just reveal a little more magic.

mansion-attic-2-021

Picture Sources:

https://www.istockphoto.com/photos/creepy-attic

https://dna645design.com/portfolio/mansion-attic-witches-of-east-end/

 

 

Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis” describes the confusion and exhaustion a person takes on after transforming into a bug-human hybrid. Throughout this story, the main character has to adapt to his new life as an insect. He begins to have to change his routine in the way he positions himself to sleep, and he experiences physical exhaustion as he carries out his day with tasks taking more effort. Because of the stress he is enduring from changes in his life, he has to learn to prepare for the unexpected after not sleeping well.

As I was reading this, I began to wonder how his mother did not notice his appearance was different when she asked him about his train.  The physical changes in his appearance consist of short, stubby legs, unusual posture, and a change in the sound of his voice; also, he becomes uncoordinated. A boy who once was coordinated, prepared, and timely now was the very opposite of these things.

As well as this, he later visits his workplace and feels unseen and unheard, for the staff do not know he is there. He witnesses his boss, the chief clerk, ask his father why he missed his train and have to lie for him. The main character feels voiceless as he cannot explain his actions to his boss without the assistance from his father. Yet, he later finds out from the chief himself that he has jeopardized his job. As a helpless bug, he cannot stop his boss from firing him for his actions and not stating the reasons to him. He then grabs the attention of his boss by turning a small key in the door to inform him he is there.

Later, Gregor realizes he has to do things on his own without the assistance of others. He has to open doors himself, speak for himself, has to learn to walk backwards, must move on his own in his new body, and has to escape a pool of coffee.

The story ends with Gregor and his family experiencing joy in the form of the outdoors, while being content with their lives, jobs, and living situation.

The Beast Within

deer2Samantha Hunt’s “Beast” depicts the complications of married life through the use of anamorphic qualities, which highlight the topics of inner conflict, longing, desire, and infidelity. Our narrator describes her nights beside her husband as she morphs into a deer, which can be interpreted as her animalistic tendencies from actively committing adultery taking psychical shape. Deer are known to inhabit populated, urban areas. They are oftentimes killed on highways. This may tie back to the narrator’s situation in which she finds herself conducting actions that could damage her life. She is out of place. She is not in the right habitat.

She has underlying feelings of guilt and shame for her actions, as her husband is a good and dutiful man. The need to tell him that she turns into a deer at night might be her version of confessing to cheating; in both scenarios, her husband would not be understanding of her situation. She teeters on the edge of admitting to a part of herself that she fears will ruin her marriage. She feels a sense of isolation as a deer in their bedroom, unable to share her feelings with the one person in life who is supposed to be there with her through anything and everything. When they are two different species, there is a barrier, a divide, that secludes not only her but her husband as well. They are in two separate worlds at this point in the story.

Later, we learn that he tdeer3oo morphs into a deer at night. This unexpectedness portrays the idea that while we are so wrapped up in our own situations, people around us may be going through similar things. Perhaps her husband has cheated on her too, or has been dishonest, or has acted in beastly ways without her knowing. They now share this.

As they leave behind their home and everything they’ve known of domestic life, they embark into the wild and are soon met with more deer. Their animalistic tendencies urge them to join the herd and disappear as individuals. Perhaps Hunt is trying to portray here that, at the end of the day, we all return to our roots as animals, and that ignoring this part of human nature only delays the inevitable. To conform to our nature allows us to be released from our complicated and intricate tragedies as human beings. The weight of emotions is heavy, and the simplicity of life is so very light. As they meld into the herd of creatures; they have severed their ties with their humanity. They return back to nature, forgetting the burden of materialistic feelings that serve no purpose other than to complicate life. They become beasts in their own right — although not in the sense that they are to be feared, or are wild and destructive, but rather something that is simply less human, less tortuous.

Symbolizing Shapeshifting

Shapeshifting or transformation stories can be found throughout all history and cultures. In almost all of these stories, the transformation is never just a simple one. Instead, it is used as a symbol for what is happening in the character’s life.

After reading the stories “Mantis,” “Fatso,” and “Beast,” I found the symbolism of “Mantis” the most interesting. The girl’s transformation into a praying mantis is the symbolic representation of her growth into a woman, viewed through the lens of a girl with a very sheltered view of the world. Her mother is more focused on her daughter’s beauty, and the protagonist is doing her best with the very natural desire to fit into the mold that has been presented to her. By fully transforming into a praying mantis and eating the boy she was talking to, she embraces who she is now. She has accepted she doesn’t need to keep a certain “beautiful” image she’d been focused on maintaining. Since a praying mantis will eat the males when they mate, I took her eating him as going against what her schooling had taught her, and sleeping with him is truly embracing who she really is.

I, however, liked the story of “Fatso” the most. A man’s girlfriend transforms into a fat hairy man every night. The man ends up making the best of the situation, and the hairy man version of his girlfriend becomes his best friend. The story’s plot seems to represent the changes that happen in a relationship once you start to get comfortable with someone. You don’t feel like you need to put on a perfect image of yourself and relax. While it might be a little odd at first, when you really love someone you accept these imperfect parts of them, and it ends up making your relationship stronger.

The three assigned readings this week were about different kinds of fantastical transformations. Etgar Keret’s “Fatso” was about a man’s girlfriend turning into a large, hairy man every night. Samantha Hunt’s “Beast” presents a woman who becomes a deer once her husband turns off the light at night. Finally, Julia Armfield’s “Mantis” by Julia Armfield, was about an adolescent girl with a skin condition slowly losing parts of herself before transforming into a mantis.

All of these stories had an interesting occurrence where the transformations weren’t treated as if they were as extremely shocking as they would be in real life. The man in “Fatso” continues dating his girlfriend and spends his nights hanging out with her alternate self. The woman in “Beast” believes that her husband will be in disbelief about her nightly issue, but he just asks to see it. The girl in “Mantis” transforms at the end of the story, and she doesn’t seem to be a bit surprised. 

The man in “Fatso” was a bit shocked in the beginning, but as he grew to become good friends with the man his girlfriend turned into, he acted as if it were normal. They go out and eat and party and do things that I assume the girlfriend wouldn’t do. It’s interesting how the speaker seems to have a two-in-one deal. He has his beautiful, sweet girlfriend to love during the day, and his large, loud pal that she becomes during the night. It feels like a bit of a wild metaphor for loving someone no matter what weird baggage they might carry with them.

“Beast” involves a lot of disconnect between the speaker and her husband. She admits that she didn’t marry him out of love, although she did grow to love him. She admits that she cheated on him on a whim, and that she would never admit this to him. She also keeps her secret of turning into a deer to herself for a little while before finally telling him. In comparison to the transformation in “Fatso,” the main character here has a transformation into something beautiful and wholesome, as opposed to loud and wild. Deer are often skittish creatures, and even hunters will take their beauty home with them to mount on their walls. However, the speaker is still hesitant to tell her husband about it. There isn’t the same unconditional love in “Beast” as in “Fatso.” In the end of “Beast,” when the woman is going to show her husband her furry secret, she wakes to find that not only her husband, but many people have been transformed, as well. I think a possible metaphor here could be that since the main character came clean, she was able to become a wholesome being along with everyone else.

I believe the reason the transformation is unsurprising in “Mantis” specifically is because it could be representative of something else entirely. “Mantis” follows the main character through her adolescence, focusing on her and her peers’ changing bodies as they grow up. There is talk of acne and shaving legs and sweaty armpits. The girls also go through mental changes, as they start to take up interest in boys. In the end, the main character is led away by a boy, Mark Kemper at a party. Her skin condition is acting up horribly, and she talks of how she can feel her skin splitting and shedding worse than usual. The boy makes advances on her, and her body reacts by shedding her skin completely to reveal a praying mantis beneath it. The story does not directly state what her new form is, but the reader can gather from the title and a few detailed lines, such as: “A suddenness of mandibles and curving neck, eyes sliding into lateral position, long hands that bend straight down as if in inverted prayer.” 

The way the characters react to these different changes reflects on themselves. With “Fatso,” the reader sees the love the speaker has for his significant other. In “Beast,” it is revealed how little of a connection there is between the married couple. Lastly, in “Mantis,” the main character’s new form reflects her new status in the world following adolescence.

In all of the stories that we’ve read for this week, the characters’ transformations into various insects or animals moved the story by making them confront something within themselves or, ironically, revealing certain truths in their loved ones. In “The Metamorphosis,” Gregor Samsa’s transformation into a cockroach not only changes his and his family’s entire living situation, but it also brings out the characters of his family members as they react to the change. Gregor’s sister is caring and seems to want to do what will make Gregor happiest in the beginning, while his mother and father stay more distant. The family has to learn how to provide for themselves without Gregor’s help, and Gregor is forced to confront his now uselessness and how that has changed his relationship to his family. Kafka is gentle in the way he exposes Gregor’s suffering, which makes the impacts of his feelings and torments louder. In the end, the story reveals how life struggles to continue in the face of crippling burdens, even in ways that seem utterly absurd.

“Beast” and “Fatso” follow the same vein of using transformation to illuminate the conflicts in relationships. I personally really liked “Fatso” because the transformation felt like a very thin metaphor for explaining how your relationship changes with someone as you become more comfortable with them. The story used the technique in order to enhance the insecurities people face when opening up to each other, like being really hairy or wanting to eat a whole steak. In “Beast,” the narrator is more so grappling with an inner conflict of being a cheater and how they’re worried it will affect her relationship with her husband. The transformation is now something that’s hidden– the narrator is scared for how the husband will react, and even worries about it being violent. In the end, she reveals her secret of “turning into a deer at night,” and that night the husband changes along with her. I read the ending of the story as both characters confessing to each other about cheating and that by joining the stream of other deer, they were recognizing that they weren’t alone in struggling with it.

“Mantis” was a bit different in that the narrator never confronts their transformation in a fleshed out context until the end of the story, which allows for the surprise and takes away a certain amount of tension from the narrator. She isn’t conflicted about her identity– her condition seems like more of fact of life that she has to deal with and be more careful of in contrast to a society that doesn’t. By putting the transformation at the end, it also makes the reader reflect on what they’ve read and see it in a new light. The girls of the school almost have a predatory light to them after considering the ending, and the praying mantis at the end sort of puts a lid on the sexual tension that had been growing throughout the story. The narrator transforms and seems to triumph over her own body.

Transformations happen all of the time, whether it be in the clear skies that shift into thunderclouds or withered leaves that turn to dust on the ground. The readings for this week all focused on different types of physical transformations and how they affect the lives of those in the story.

“Mantis” portrayed a young woman struggling with the shedding of her skin as well as the loss of her teeth and hair. Though these gradual changes are drastically different from that of her peers, they are still reminiscent of the stages of puberty that everyone goes through. The protagonist focuses on how her changes affect her appearance and how everyone views her because of it, creating a want to fit in. This is perpetuated through her mother’s attempts to help keep her looking fit for the role that society has given her: a beautiful teenage girl in the beginnings of adolescence. Though her mother does her best to help her daughter maintain a certain image, during the party the protagonist realizes that it is okay to shed the skin she has been trying to maintain because that is not who she truly is. 

“Fatso” is similar in that the female character wants acceptance and love towards the transformation she undergoes during the night. Though the male protagonist didn’t actually believe she actually turns into a fat man in the night, he makes the best out of the situation that presents itself. He learns to love this different side of her, even if it may seem weird or out of the ordinary, and they both gain a beautiful relationship because of it.

“Beast” takes on themes from both “Mantis” and “Fatso,” exploring the relationship between two people while realizing that there is no need to try and maintain a false appearance. The female protagonist has both negative and positive aspects of herself that she does not necessarily share with her husband for fear of his judgment. There is a lack of connection between her and her husband within their relationship, making the task of explaining her transformation all the more difficult. Once she does tell her husband, and she finds out that he also transforms into a deer, the couple then share a more profound bond than they had before.

These stories all describe key transformations within life, whether it be the shift to adolescence or the strengthening of intimacy within a marriage. It is normal for change to occur, and it often helps us learn to become better versions of ourselves.

This week’s reading we read “The Metamorphosis” by Frank Kurtz, “Mantis” by Julia Armfield, “Fatso” by Etgar Keret, and “Beast” by Samantha Hunt. This stories are about physical change, but also about the messages that lie underneath.

While reading”The Metamorphosis”many metaphors became apparent about self realization and realizing what components make a human being. After Gregor transformation, his love for art, life, and culture still thrived. He lived off the fact that his family needing him. Once that need disappeared and his family began to slowly forget about him, his need to live slowly began to disappear. The family also went through a transformation by being forced to find means of living. They once again to begin to find a purpose through their meaning for life changes. A change mainly happens between Emily. In the beginning, she begins to help Gregor, but as time goes on she begins to treat Gregor as this inhuman object instead of a human being. Once Gregor dies, the family begins to realize that he was a human and not so much as a burden.

 “Beast was a a transformation of a married women into a deer. The story is an explantation of what happened to turned this women into a deer. The wife cheats on her husband, and turns into a deer at night. When a person thinks about a deer the idea of it being unsure and unfaithful is not one that comes to mind. Deers represent the innocence, kindness, grace, and luck. I believe that her turning into a deer is there to reminds her of who she use to be before committing an act of sin. Hernando’s Hideaway was a song that scared her. The song stalked about doing adult things which gives me the idea that she does not like to reminded of the acts that she commits.

“Fatso” is a short story about a man’s girlfriend who transform every night into this fat, hairy man who likes to go out to bars and watch soccer. At the beginning, the story did not lead me to the conclusion of a women turning into a man’s best friend. I thought he was going to be a cheater. Instead it showed that he loved her no matter what or form.

“Mantis” is a story about a young girl who attends an all girls catholic school. As a child growing up her mother tells her that she has a severe skin condition passed down through genetics. Throughout the story, she describes her experience with her friends and her personal journey. Some things that came up where her emotions towards her flaws, insecurities, and her dating life. As the story goes on, the author pays close attention to her peeling skin and the details about her grandmother. The mother focuses on her daughter beauty and looks more than her daughter does. Eventually, she turns into this praying mantis and proceed to eat the boy she was talking too. Her transformation has a lot of self hatred and anger. While she tries to forget about what makes her different or standout everyone else is focused on it.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »